quousque:

so I found this thing, and now I am 100% sure of my orientation, for the first time since I was aware that sexual orientation was a thing (early high school), and it’s a bigger relief than I thought it would be. I didn’t realize just how subtly stressful it is to not be sure of something so fundamental to our society’s concept of identity until I was. I’m asexual, y’all.

I see a lot of people (not so much on tumblr, but on reddit and real life) complain about the Really Specific sexual identity labels, saying shit like “wow now they’re just making it up” and “ahhaha stupid tumblerina sjw’s” etc. What I’d like to say to those people, if I could, is that people aren’t making up new sexual orientations (or genders, or what have you), people are just coming up with more specific terms to describe more specific portions of the human experience. 

We’re experiencing somewhat of a renaissance in terms of sexual and gender identity liberation, and therefor we’re thinking a lot more about our experiences, and we are more able than ever before to seek out people with experiences similar to our own. It’s only natural that people would come up with more specific terms as we talk about this kind of stuff more.

People always create new terms when they start having conversations about stuff that people haven’t talked about before. Aristotle, Plato and Cicero dedicated chunks of their work to defining terms that we today consider to be the basic vocabulary of philosophical discussion. Terms are basically a shortcut to meaning. Just as a philosopher finds it useful to have a generally understood definition of ‘virtue’, people who talk about sexual and gender identity find it useful to have specific terms for concepts in their areas, as well. 

A hundred years ago, everyone in the LGBT+ community would probably just say they were ‘queer’. Then the community specifically developed terms for trans, lesbian, and gay, because they found it useful to distinguish those meanings, even though they all fell under ‘queer’ (as it was understood at the time- I’m not saying you have to ID as queer if you’re in LGT, just pointing out historical use). People in the community saying “well, my experience is similar to yours, but different in these ways” and others going “me too, i’m different in those same ways” leads to more specific terms, like bisexual and asexual, and a whole bunch of more specific terms under asexuality. 

Labels are useful because they tell you that you aren’t the only one, and there’s nothing “wrong” with you. When I read about autochorissexuality, it was a relief, because it meant that other people experienced the same things that I do. I can use that label to find other people like me. My first thought upon seeing the image above was a mix of “oh it’s me” and “THANK GOD it’s not just me”. 

Now, I probably won’t go around telling people that I’m autochorrissexual. Because most people will have no fucking clue what that means. Hell, probably not even most people in the ace community know what it means. If people ask, I’ll say I’m asexual. Or, if I don’t want to explain asexuality and don’t think they’ll already know what it means, I’ll say bisexual, since I am interested in people of multiple genders (just not sexually). Or, I might just say “queer” because that covers it, too. So even if I don’t go around using this label in everyday life, I’m glad that it exists, because it means that other people share my experiences, and that I can finally be sure that I have a place, in terms of sexual identity.

the-sun-of-rome-is-set:

chronolith:

systlin:

tomcats-and-tophats:

garliccloves:

classical-cacophony:

wardencommanderrodimiss:

this is too real

Note this doesn’t work for bi girls!! 

Mara Wilson is a bisexual woman

Boy bands are almost overwhelmingly cultivated around the easiest way to sell shit to young girls, which very heavily leans into societally dominant heterosexual love story narratives, which in themselves tend to focus on specific attitudes towards gender roles, presentation, and styles of attraction. 

Bi women are not straight so we do not conceptualize our gender and attraction the same way a straight woman would because we do not function under the same societal pressures and dynamics. Ergo, the marketing around and content within the songs by many boy bands can be incredibly alienating to a bi woman audience even if they still experience attraction to men because we often do not experience that attraction in a way palpable to or even considered by those cultivating the public image of these bands.

Accusing Mara Wilson, a bi woman, of bi erasure, for sharing an amusing anecdote on her own experience, is ridiculous. But it is also an incredible disservice to bi women like myself who are more than acutely aware that we are (and always have been) a far cry from this media’s target audience – and it is, in fact, a demonstration of the effects of bi erasure that people so stalwartly align us with heterosexuality that we’re accused of erasing ourselves when we talk about our alienation from mainstream m/f-focused media.

As another bi woman, I had to blink and think if I even know any boy bands. 

I don’t. 

Same. I spent a solid 10 minutes trying to remember any boy bands *ever* and drew a massive blank.

Bi as fuck over here.

Ace lesbian, couldn’t even name a boy band. COULD name a dozen baritones / bass-baritones anytime, though. I just fucking despised pop music even as a teen.

Aro-ace, and while I can remember a couple of boy bands from when I was younger, I’m pretty sure I listened to some of their music as part of my “anything and everything made in the late 90s/early 00s, because I would like something NOT MY PARENTS MUSIC, not even remotely”. None of it is was anything that stuck with me.

(Granted, neither did anything else that involved romance or sex, beyond being able to tolerate it. Love songs do not make it into my most played play lists, and never have, even when I was doing the dating thing because it was expected by my own conception of how society worked.)

aspecpplarebeautiful:

Reminder that libido and sexual attraction are separate things.

Libido and sex drive refers to how much and how often your body wants sexual release.

Sexual attraction is wanting to have sex with and/or being aroused by a specific person.

You can have a libido and still be asexual. In fact a lot of asexuals do.

lesbiangender:

wild idea here but… instead of pushing this idea that teenagers can’t be asexual bc they’re children and not wanting sex is normal, how about “if you identify as ace as a teenager but later realize you just didn’t want sex bc you were a kid and stop identifying that way, that’s okay” and realizing that doesn’t mean no one can know they’re asexual as a teenager and stop maybe telling asexual teenagers that they’re too young to be ace bc that’s really weird given that teenagers are cetainly capable of being non-asexual also you totally can’t decide something like that for someone else

i-am-the-punk-mermaid:

i-am-the-punk-mermaid:

I literally dont know how i can make this any more clear. Asexual and aromantic people belong in the LGBT community as much as the rest of us. And before your dumbass pipes up “but not cishet aces”, first of all fuck you. Secondly, they are NOT HETERO. They are Asexual. Which literally negates the idea of them possibly being heterosexual. They are not heteromantic. They are Aromantic. Which literally negates the idea of them possibly being heteromantic.
Support aces and aros this pride season.

I lose followers every time i reblog this. Good. Aphobes can gtfo my blog.

sabertoothwalrus:

when making ace characters/headcanons please remember:

  • not liking romance =/= being ace
  • not liking sex =/= being ace
  • ace =/= cishet
  • ace = no sexual attraction
  • “lol their sexuality is pizza” fuck you
  • but seriously ace people are not obsessed with food
  • some ace people like sex. some are just neutral. some are sex-repulsed. it’s not a unanimous thing.
  • “I think this character is ace” “but they’re gay!” yeah what’s your fuckin point
  • being ace =/= not gay
  • don’t infantilize ace people. being ace doesn’t make someone uwu pure
  • it’s okay to headcanon kids as ace. it’s not like you’re not allowed to be ace until you hit a certain age. If I had more information about what being ace was when I was a kid, I have no doubt I would have been calling myself ace way earlier.
  • however: your reasoning for headcanoning a kid as ace shouldn’t be because they’re not having/interested in sex. Well, yeah, duh. Of course they aren’t. They’re a kid.
  • ace people can’t be “cured” by “the right person”